Empathia Group · NDIS Strategy · Workforce

The community access reset removes one in five support hours by 2028.

The companion to our community access analysis asks where a $13.2 billion saving comes from. Nearly all of it comes from moving half of community access from one-to-one to group delivery. Participants keep their hours, and the worker hours that deliver them fall by two thirds.

By Empathia GroupStructural analysis~14 min read · interactive
0k
Direct support FTE, top-1,000 base
0k
FTE removed by 2030-31
$0b
Annual wage value of removed hours
0k
FTE removed by group re-pricing
$237m
Penalty-rate income lost by 2030-31

Wages are about eighty-six cents of every revenue dollar in disability support, so a $38.1 billion reform package is mostly a reduction in paid labour. This paper counts the hours removed by its largest measure, the community access reset: how many, from which workers, through which mechanism, and when.

01. The measure, read as a payroll event

What the saving is made of

Our previous paper's central case cuts exposed community access budgets by 35 percent at full phase-in and moves half of those supports from one-to-one to one-to-three groups. A participant who converts keeps their hours at a third of the price, so their spending falls by two thirds, and so do the worker hours behind it. Half the pool at two thirds off is a 33 percent cut. That leaves two points for the half that stays one-to-one, whose budgets fall by only about 3 percent.

The tabled mature saving, $4.3 billion a year, is about 32 percent of the scheme's exposed budgets after participant exits, so group pricing alone can deliver almost all of it. The result holds if converted participants also give up some hours, because that budget stays with the one-to-one cohort and total worker hours barely move. The saving will hardly show in participant outcome data. It will show in full in rosters.

Scenario · central case
FTE removed 30,000 · hours retained 79.1%
Year
budget reduction (full phase-in)35%
conversion to group delivery50%
under-fill (sessions one seat short)15%
Exhibit 1 · Interactive
The re-pricing identity
The tabled effective reduction decomposes exactly into two cohorts. Values are budget retention per pre-reform dollar of exposed revenue. Move reduction or conversion and the staying cohort's retention rebalances to hold the identity.
stays 1:1 · 52%keeps 97.0% budget
converts 1:3 · 48%keeps 33.3% budget, 100.0% hours
Staying cohort budget retention
97.0%
Converting cohort hours retention
100.0%
Blended budget retention
66.6%
Tabled effective reduction
66.6%

Blended retention 66.6% equals the tabled effective reduction of 66.6%.

Cohort shares reflect conversion phasing with the reset. The identity holds at every phase point; where a combination drives the staying cohort above 100% retention it is flagged rather than clamped silently.
02. The workforce baseline

From the cost model to a headcount

The NDIA's Disability Support Worker Cost Model builds a price cap from an award wage: $38.50 an hour at SCHADS 2.3, plus leave, superannuation and overheads, gives a weekday cap of $73.58. Run in reverse, it turns revenue into a workforce.

Exhibit 2
From an award wage to a workforce
The 2026-27 DSW Cost Model price stack for a standard weekday support hour, the two books built band by band from it, and the resulting workforce. The FTE count uses each book's band-weighted price, which sits above the weekday cap.
Cost model stack, DSW Level 1$/hour
SCHADS 2.3 base wage38.50
After leave, superannuation and allowances52.94
After operational overheads (21.65%)64.41
After corporate overheads (12.00%)72.13
Weekday daytime price cap after 2.00% margin — the cheapest of six bands73.58
Band, and the price limit each book buys atPrice limitExposed mix24/7 mixPaid hrs
Weekday daytime$73.5876%42%1.00
Weekday evening$81.076%15%1.00
Active night$82.57–6%1.00
Saturday$103.5412%13%1.00
Sunday$133.506%13%1.00
Sleepover ($311.79 per night)$38.97–11%0.20
Weighted average, per clock hour$81.22$83.12
÷ paid worker hours per clock hour1.0000.912
× 97% realisation against cap$78.78$88.41

Priced entirely at weekday daytime, both books would sit at $71.37. Saturday and Sunday lift the 24/7 book $12.43 an hour above that, and the exposed book $6.97.

Workforce derivationValue
Exposed book price per paid worker hour$78.78
Non-exposed book price per paid worker hour$88.41
Billable hours per FTE-year (1,672 worked × 90%)1,505
Revenue per FTE-year, exposed book$118,600
Revenue per FTE-year, non-exposed book$133,100
Revenue per direct FTE-year, blended$129,500
DSW-delivered share of in-scope revenue94%
Direct support FTE across the $19.8b base≈143,500
Headcount at 22.7 average weekly hours≈240,000
Stack from the NDIS Disability Support Worker Cost Model 2026-27; average weekly hours from the NDS Workforce Census 2025. The exposed book uses the section 04 mix and the non-exposed book a continuous-roster mix.

The $19.8 billion of in-scope revenue supports about 143,500 direct support FTE, or 240,000 workers at the census average of 22.7 hours a week. Most are part-time or casual, between a fifth and a quarter leave each year, and at average hours they earn $35,000 to $45,000. Most are also paid below the cost model's benchmark classification, a gap worth about 12 percent of the exposed book's wage bill. The Fair Work Commission's provisional 15 percent rise in Schedule E home care rates from 1 October 2026 closes part of that gap with no matching price change, adding about four and a half cents of wage cost to every exposed revenue dollar.

03. The channels

Where the hours go

By 2028-29 the sector loses about 30,000 FTE, 21 percent of its hours. Participant attrition accounts for 20,500: people leaving the scheme take their worker hours with them across every support line. Group conversion removes 9,700. The one-to-one book loses about 500, because its budgets barely move. Under-fill and weekend re-banding add about 700 back, since both use more worker hours for the same revenue.

Exhibit 3 · Interactive
Where the FTE go
Decomposition of the direct support FTE reduction at 2028-29. Three channels remove hours and two add some back.
−20,500
Attrition
−480
1:1 thinning
−9,690
Group re-pricing
+360
Under-filled seats
+320
Weekend re-banding
Net direct FTE removed
30,000
Removed while participant hours unchanged
9,690
Held back by under-fill + re-banding
690

Hours fall almost exactly in line with revenue, because group prices are set so that a worker hour earns about the same at any ratio. Community access is slightly more labour-intensive per dollar than the rest of the sector, which pulls hours down a little faster; under-fill and re-banding offset it.

Under-fill is the only lever that keeps workers employed without revenue. At the central case it holds about 360 FTE in the sector at 2028-29, each costing a loaded salary of $96,500 with nothing billed against it, $35 million in total. With vehicle, venue and minimum-engagement costs added, each position kept costs about 2.2 salaries. That is the price of running groups below ratio to hold staff through the transition.

04. The weekend

The hours that pay the rent

Saturday and Sunday price limits are 1.41 and 1.81 times the weekday rate, because the cap applies the penalty loading to the whole price stack. Supervision and the back office are still paid at weekday rates, so the extra funding lands in margin. When budgets fall, the same dollars buy more weekday hours, and the central case moves 60 percent of the converted book's evening and weekend hours to weekdays.

Exhibit 4 · Interactive
The four prices of a support hour
Community participation price limits by band, NDIS Pricing Schedule 2026-27, against the loaded wage and non-wage cost of each hour.
BandPrice limitLoaded wageNon-wageMargin/hr% of revenue
Weekday daytime$73.58$52.94$19.19$1.452.0%
Weekday evening$81.07$59.56$19.19$2.322.9%
Saturday$103.54$79.41$19.19$4.944.8%
Sunday$133.50$105.88$19.19$8.436.3%
Cash margin per hour, by band
Weekday daytime
$1.45
Weekday evening
$2.32
Saturday
$4.94
Sunday
$8.43

At flat overhead consumption, 53% of the exposed book's cash margin sits in the 24% of its hours delivered on evenings and weekends.

weekend hours moved to weekday (σ)60%
home care share of exposed workforce50%
Worker vignette: 4 Sat hours
$224
Re-delivered as 5.6 weekday hours
$210
Change in take-home pay
−6.2%
Schedule E uplift, per exposed $ (from 1 Oct 2026, hc 50%)
+4.6c

The percentage change is the same at either pay rate; the dollar amounts differ. At the paid Saturday rate the margin per hour is $7.31. The budget gains from the weekend shift and the worker bears the cost.

Margins hold non-wage cost flat at the weekday funded $19.19. A workers-compensation sliver scales with the band and is shown as the trimmed variant. Public holidays, roughly one percent of hours, are excluded.

The shift adds back about 300 FTE by 2030-31, all at ordinary rates. Penalty-rate income on community access rosters falls by $237 million a year by 2030-31, from $401 million; the shift accounts for $30 million of that and lost hours for the rest. Workers who stay on the exposed book lose 32.6 percent of their hours and 34.0 percent of their pay. At 22.7 hours a week, penalty rates were a large part of what made those rosters pay a living.

05. The path

Positions, rosters and the closing of the entry door

About 50,000 workers leave the sector each year, so most of the reduction can be absorbed by not replacing them. Some positions will go where services close, and most of the change will show up as fewer shifts. By 2030-31 the average remaining worker has lost close to a fifth of their hours.

Exhibit 5 · Interactive
The five-year workforce path
In-scope base of ≈143,500 direct FTE. Positions assume a share of the reduction lands as eliminated roles and the balance thins remaining rosters.
2026-272027-282028-292029-302030-31
Direct FTE removed (cumulative)2,97015,20030,00041,30045,300
Share of baseline hours2.1%10.6%20.9%28.8%31.6%
Positions eliminated1,8209,35018,40025,40027,800
Average hours cut, remaining workers1.1%6.1%12.4%17.7%19.6%
Annual wage value removed$0.3b$1.6b$3.1b$4.4b$4.8b
reduction landing as eliminated positions40%

Around 50,000 workers leave the sector each year, so hiring freezes can absorb most of the reduction. For most of the workforce the reform will show up as fewer shifts.

Wage value at the cost model's loaded rates by band, net of the weekend re-banding. The positions and thinning rows are one incidence scenario, set by the lever below; the FTE row is the modelled quantity.

The sector's largest single-year fall is 2028-29, when attrition accelerates and conversion is already 95 percent phased in. High-exposure providers, where conversion dominates, peak a year earlier. In 2023 the NDIS Review estimated the scheme needed 128,000 more workers by June 2025; within about eighteen months the sector moves from recruitment drives to hiring freezes.

06. Exposure

Workforce loss by portfolio exposure

Every provider loses a quarter of its workforce by 2030-31 through participant attrition alone. Each ten points of revenue in the exposed line adds about 2.5 FTE lost per hundred.

Exhibit 6 · Interactive
Direct FTE lost per 100 baseline FTE
By exposed share of revenue and year. Click a row to load that composition into the organisation ledger below.
exposure26-2727-2828-2929-3030-31
0%
0.0
3.9
14.3
22.5
25.5
10%
0.9
6.9
17.2
25.3
28.2
20%
1.8
9.8
20.1
28.1
30.9
23% ·avg
2.1
10.7
21.0
28.9
31.6
30%
2.7
12.7
22.9
30.7
33.4
40%
3.6
15.5
25.7
33.3
35.9
50%
4.4
18.2
28.4
35.9
38.4
60%
5.2
20.8
31.0
38.4
40.8
70%
6.0
23.4
33.6
40.8
43.1
FTE lost per 100 baseline (all losses)pinned composition (feeds the org ledger)
Scheme attrition applied uniformly across compositions, as in the margin model.

The 98 providers with more than half their revenue in community access average seventy percent exposure and lose about forty percent of their direct workforce by 2029-30. Sixty-three of them are charities, mostly running day programs, so the deepest cuts will be announced by not-for-profit boards whose main problem was their revenue mix.

07. The corporate wave

The second restructure, on a lag

Corporate overhead is 13 percent of revenue and 70 percent of it is fixed in the short run. As providers resize it to their remaining revenue, about 3,300 back-office roles go, a fifth of the total, mostly in the back half of the window.

Exhibit 7 · Interactive
The corporate wave, on a lag
Eventual corporate FTE reduction by year, with the cumulative revenue decline that drives it.
Baseline corporate FTE
15,200
Eventual corporate cut
3,340
Share of the back office
22%
2026-27
220 · 2%
2027-28
1,110 · 10%
2028-29
2,210 · 21%
2029-30
3,050 · 29%
2030-31
3,340 · 31%

The corporate teams that run the conversion programs, rebuild the rosters and renegotiate the leases are the teams whose own positions the completed adjustment then removes. A board that reads the timetable can run one restructure instead of two.

Overhead tolerance, the revenue decline the cost base can absorb before contribution stops covering fixed overhead, is about 35 percent at the baseline structure. The sector reaches the mature year with its tolerance almost exhausted, so corporate restructures cluster in the back half of the window.
08. The organisation

The net employment ledger of a single provider

A median-shaped provider, $20 million of revenue at 23 percent exposure, ends the window about 30 percent smaller in people. Three quarters of that is participant attrition, just under a fifth is group conversion, and the rest is corporate right-sizing. The board controls the pace of conversion and the timing of the restructure.

Exhibit 8 · Interactive
Your net employment ledger
Enter your revenue and exposure, or click a row in the composition table above to prefill it. Corporate right-sizing is shown at its eventual value; in practice it lags the direct contraction by one to two years.
your annual revenue ($m)$20m
exposed share of revenue23%
Baseline2027-282028-292030-31
Revenue, $m20.017.915.813.7
Direct FTE14513011599
Corporate FTE (post right-sizing)15.414.213.112.0
Total FTE161144128111
Cumulative FTE removed–173349
Ends the window smaller by
31%
Group density: FTE per 10 pts exposure held
2.6
Under-fill: loaded salaries per position held
1.0–2.2

The levers priced in this analysis are group density, deliberate under-fill and weekend defence. We can run this ledger on your own participant and roster data.

Book a workforce planning call →
Exhibit 9 · Interactive
Your workforce, off the payment data
The same FOI-data footing as the previous paper's lookup, extended to the workforce. For a selected provider: estimated direct FTE, headcount, and the modelled FTE path at current levers, at the sector-average delivery mix and cost model assumptions.
Public data: NDIA FOI 25/26-3645, top-1,000 indirect provider payments, FY2025-26. Direct FTE is built band by band on the provider's own composition: non-exposed revenue at $133,100 per FTE-year and exposed revenue at $118,600, both at the 94% DSW-delivered share. Intermediaries carry an exclusion note.

Track the conversion calendar against plan rollover dates, the fill rate of every recurring group by day of week, and the date your cumulative revenue decline crosses your overhead tolerance. That last date sets when the corporate restructure arrives.

Empathia Group

The workforce restructure has a timetable. We help boards read it.

Our operational retainer tracks your conversion calendar, the fill rate of every recurring group by day of week, attrition in your own participant book, and the date your revenue decline crosses your overhead tolerance, which sets the timing of your corporate restructure.

Book a call →
Empathia Insider

Sector analysis, in your inbox.

Occasional, considered analysis on SIL economics, NDIS reform, and provider viability. And you can unsubscribe anytime.

Method & Sources